What Is Remoteness of Damages in Contract

Remoteness of damages refers to how closely connected damages resulting from a breach of contract are to the breach itself. In other words, if a party breaches a contract, is it reasonable to expect them to be responsible for all damages resulting from that breach, or only those damages that are a direct result of the breach?

In general, damages are considered to be too remote if they were not foreseeable at the time the contract was formed. This means that if a party breaches a contract, they are not responsible for damages that were not reasonably foreseeable based on the information available at the time the contract was signed.

For example, if you hire a contractor to renovate your kitchen and they fail to complete the work on time, causing you to miss a deadline for hosting a dinner party, you may seek damages for the cost of hiring a different contractor to complete the work and any lost income from the dinner party. However, if the dinner party was a high-end fundraiser that you failed to mention to the contractor at the time the contract was signed, the damages may be considered too remote, as they were not reasonably foreseeable at the time of the contract.

There are two types of damages that are considered when determining remoteness: direct damages and consequential damages. Direct damages are those that arise directly from the breach of contract, such as the cost of repairing defective work. Consequential damages, on the other hand, are those that arise as a result of the breach but are not a direct result, such as lost profits or lost revenue.

Courts will often consider several factors when determining whether damages are too remote. These may include the type of contract, the knowledge and experience of the parties involved, and any special circumstances or contingencies that were discussed at the time of the contract.

It is important to note that parties to a contract may limit or waive their liability for remote damages through a limitation of liability clause or a liquidated damages clause. A limitation of liability clause sets a cap on the amount of damages that can be recovered in the event of a breach, while a liquidated damages clause specifies a predetermined amount of damages that will be paid in the event of a breach.

In conclusion, the concept of remoteness of damages is an important consideration in contract law. It helps to ensure that parties are held responsible only for damages that were reasonably foreseeable at the time the contract was signed and helps to prevent excessive or unfair liability. Understanding this concept is essential for anyone involved in drafting or enforcing contracts.

Scroll to Top